SIDE-BY-SIDE EVIDENCE
Compare evidence.
Keep the context.
Select 2–3 profiles from the English Library. Class and grade describe evidence and regulatory context, not comparative effectiveness or suitability for an individual.
Choose profilesSIDE-BY-SIDE EVIDENCE VIEW
Compare selected profiles
| Molecule |  Ostarine / Enobosarm | Ligandrol / LGD-4033 | RAD140 / Vosilasarm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research Topic | Clinical / Endocrine Pharmacology | Clinical / Endocrine Pharmacology | Clinical / Endocrine Pharmacology |
| Pharmacology | Nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulator candidate | Nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulator candidate | Investigational selective androgen receptor modulator |
| PrimeCore Class | Class BInvestigational | Class BInvestigational | Class BInvestigational |
| Evidence Grade | Grade BStrong controlled human evidence | Grade BStrong controlled human evidence | Grade CEarly human evidence |
| Evidence boundary | Ostarine, enobosarm, GTx-024 and MK-2866 refer to the same investigational SARM candidate in the reviewed literature. Controlled trials reported lean-body-mass signals in selected older adults and cancer populations, but do not establish bodybuilding benefit, long-term safety or product approval. FDA states that no SARM is approved and warns of serious harms. Online naming does not establish identity or amount, and WADA 2026 prohibits enobosarm at all times. | Ligandrol and LGD-4033 identify an investigational nonsteroidal SARM candidate. A 21-day placebo-controlled study in 76 healthy men found an exposure-related lean-mass signal alongside suppression of total testosterone, SHBG and HDL. The study was too small and short to establish clinical or bodybuilding benefit or long-term safety. FDA identifies marketed LGD-4033 products as unapproved drugs, and WADA 2026 prohibits ligandrol at all times. | RAD140, vosilasarm and the online term Testolone refer to an investigational SARM candidate; Testolone is not testosterone. A first-in-human study enrolled 22 postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer and reported target engagement, preliminary antitumour activity and frequent liver-test abnormalities. This does not establish bodybuilding or performance benefit, safety in healthy users or approval. FDA identifies marketed RAD-140 products as unapproved drugs, and WADA prohibits RAD140 at all times. |
| Unknowns | Insufficient data in the current dataset | Insufficient data in the current dataset | Insufficient data in the current dataset |
| Limitations |
|
|
|
| Sources | |||
| Read more | Read English overview | Read English overview | Read English overview |
This table does not compare doses, cross-trial outcomes or individual suitability. Missing information does not establish an absence of risk.
Choose another comparisonContinue reading
Missing fields mean information is unavailable in the current structured dataset, not that a molecule has no risks or uncertainties. English translations retain the original evidence boundaries. Where translation is not yet verified, the original Thai excerpts remain available under an explicit label. Sources retain their original language.
10 questions before drawing conclusions